Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /home/customer/www/votesleuth.org/public_html/wp-content/themes/hackbuster/functions.php on line 6509
Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /home/customer/www/votesleuth.org/public_html/wp-content/themes/hackbuster/functions.php on line 6905
Colorado
ALL votes from all counties.
Precincts added in order of number of votes.
Voters: 2,732,665 Precincts (polling places): 2,989 Average voters per precinct: 914 Votes in median precinct: 1,131Voting Machine:
Statewide aggregated Republican margin percentage increase (deltaM): 1.5%
Statewide aggregated Republican margin vote increase (deltaMxV): 42,023
deltaM by County (for counties with more than 50 polling places)
Click column header to sort.
County | deltaM | deltaMxV | Precincts | Voting Machine |
---|---|---|---|---|
ADAMS | -7.6% | -14,451 | 242 | Dominion Voting Systems |
ARAPAHOE | 4.4% | 13,057 | 381 | Dominion Voting Systems |
BOULDER | 3.3% | 6,084 | 233 | Hart InterCivic |
DENVER | 3.5% | 11,512 | 346 | Dominion Voting Systems |
DOUGLAS | -0.2% | -310 | 155 | Hart InterCivic |
EL PASO | 5.5% | 17,190 | 242 | Premier/Diebold |
JEFFERSON | 0.5% | 1,463 | 257 | ES&S |
LARIMER | -1.5% | -2,939 | 172 | Premier/Diebold |
MESA | -6.1% | -4,554 | 57 | Dominion Voting Systems |
PUEBLO | 17.4% | 13,477 | 128 | Dominion Voting Systems |
WELD | 1.1% | 1,494 | 130 | Premier/Diebold |
Voter Stats by County
Click column header to sort.
* VFR and VFD are Republican and Democratic Voting Factors. This is the ratio of percent of Republican votes to the percent of registered Republicans, and the percent of Democratic votes to the percent of registered Democrats
County | Total Votes | Turnout | Voting Machine | Rep Votes | VFR* | Dem Votes | VFD* | Reg Reps | Reg Dems | Reg Reps/Dems |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAMS | 189,249 | - | Dominion Voting Systems | 42% | 1 | 51% | 0.9 | 41% | 58% | 0.7 |
ALAMOSA | 7,115 | - | ES&S | 41% | 1 | 51% | 0.9 | 42% | 56% | 0.8 |
ARAPAHOE | 297,524 | - | Dominion Voting Systems | 39% | 0.9 | 54% | 1 | 45% | 53% | 0.8 |
ARCHULETA | 6,769 | 91% | Premier/Diebold | 58% | 0.9 | 35% | 1.1 | 66% | 33% | 2 |
BACA | 3,518 | - | Dominion Voting Systems | 72% | 1.1 | 23% | 0.7 | 67% | 32% | 2.1 |
BENT | 1,585 | 79% | Hart InterCivic | 63% | 1.2 | 31% | 0.7 | 52% | 47% | 1.1 |
BOULDER | 185,770 | - | Hart InterCivic | 22% | 0.8 | 71% | 1 | 28% | 70% | 0.4 |
BROOMFIELD | 37,382 | - | Dominion Voting Systems | 39% | 0.8 | 53% | 1.1 | 48% | 50% | 1 |
CHAFFEE | 10,789 | - | Dominion Voting Systems | 49% | 0.9 | 44% | 1 | 56% | 42% | 1.3 |
CHEYENNE | 1,478 | - | Hart InterCivic | 72% | 0.9 | 22% | 1.4 | 83% | 17% | 5.1 |
CLEAR CREEK | 4,942 | - | Dominion Voting Systems | 45% | 0.9 | 46% | 0.9 | 48% | 50% | 1 |
CONEJOS | 4,546 | 95% | Hart InterCivic | 48% | 1.1 | 46% | 0.8 | 42% | 57% | 0.7 |
COSTILLA | 1,768 | 79% | Hart InterCivic | 33% | 1.6 | 62% | 0.8 | 21% | 78% | 0.3 |
CROWLEY | 1,605 | - | Hart InterCivic | 66% | 1 | 27% | 0.8 | 67% | 32% | 2.1 |
CUSTER | 2,139 | 72% | Hart InterCivic | 69% | 0.9 | 25% | 1.3 | 80% | 19% | 4.2 |
DELTA | 16,907 | - | Hart InterCivic | 71% | 1 | 24% | 0.9 | 71% | 28% | 2.5 |
DENVER | 328,454 | - | Dominion Voting Systems | 19% | 0.8 | 74% | 1 | 23% | 75% | 0.3 |
DOLORES | 1,421 | - | Hart InterCivic | 47% | 0.7 | 47% | 1.4 | 65% | 34% | 1.9 |
DOUGLAS | 183,181 | - | Hart InterCivic | 56% | 0.8 | 37% | 1.2 | 68% | 30% | 2.3 |
EAGLE | 25,011 | - | Dominion Voting Systems | 37% | 0.8 | 56% | 1.1 | 46% | 52% | 0.9 |
EL PASO | 312,328 | - | Premier/Diebold | 57% | 0.9 | 35% | 1 | 63% | 35% | 1.8 |
ELBERT | 16,057 | - | Sequoia | 73% | 0.9 | 21% | 1.1 | 80% | 19% | 4.3 |
FREMONT | 21,930 | - | Hart InterCivic | 70% | 1 | 24% | 0.8 | 68% | 30% | 2.2 |
GARFIELD | 25,970 | - | Hart InterCivic | 50% | 0.9 | 43% | 1 | 55% | 43% | 1.3 |
GILPIN | 3,687 | - | Dominion Voting Systems | 53% | 1.1 | 39% | 0.8 | 47% | 51% | 0.9 |
GRAND | 8,373 | - | Hart InterCivic | 52% | 0.8 | 41% | 1.2 | 63% | 35% | 1.8 |
GUNNISON | 9,777 | - | Dominion Voting Systems | 35% | 0.8 | 55% | 1 | 43% | 54% | 0.8 |
HINSDALE | 285 | 49% | Hart InterCivic | 68% | 0.9 | 22% | 1 | 77% | 21% | 3.6 |
HUERFANO | 4,206 | - | Premier/Diebold | 51% | 1.4 | 43% | 0.7 | 38% | 61% | 0.6 |
JACKSON | 650 | 67% | Not Applicable+Hart InterCivic | 75% | 0.9 | 20% | 1.3 | 84% | 15% | 5.6 |
JEFFERSON | 320,985 | - | ES&S | 43% | 0.9 | 50% | 1 | 49% | 49% | 1 |
KIOWA | 1,865 | - | Hart InterCivic | 61% | 0.8 | 32% | 1.5 | 78% | 21% | 3.7 |
KIT CARSON | 3,457 | 99% | Hart InterCivic | 81% | 1 | 15% | 0.8 | 80% | 19% | 4.2 |
LA PLATA | 30,465 | - | Premier/Diebold | 41% | 0.9 | 50% | 1 | 47% | 51% | 0.9 |
LAKE | 3,172 | 90% | Dominion Voting Systems | 40% | 1.3 | 51% | 0.8 | 30% | 67% | 0.5 |
LARIMER | 192,825 | - | Premier/Diebold | 43% | 0.8 | 48% | 1.1 | 52% | 46% | 1.1 |
LAS ANIMAS | 6,173 | 82% | Hart InterCivic | 56% | 1.5 | 39% | 0.6 | 37% | 62% | 0.6 |
LINCOLN | 2,705 | - | Hart InterCivic | 72% | 0.9 | 24% | 1.2 | 79% | 20% | 4 |
LOGAN | 9,675 | - | Dominion Voting Systems | 76% | 1 | 19% | 0.8 | 74% | 25% | 3 |
MESA | 74,710 | - | Dominion Voting Systems | 65% | 1 | 29% | 0.9 | 68% | 31% | 2.2 |
MINERAL | 525 | 80% | Premier/Diebold | 0% | 0 | 86% | 1.9 | 55% | 45% | 1.2 |
MOFFAT | 6,732 | - | Hart InterCivic | 80% | 1 | 15% | 0.8 | 80% | 19% | 4.2 |
MONTEZUMA | 11,204 | 83% | Premier/Diebold | 64% | 1 | 29% | 0.9 | 65% | 34% | 1.9 |
MONTROSE | 21,706 | - | Hart InterCivic | 67% | 0.9 | 28% | 1 | 71% | 28% | 2.6 |
MORGAN | 11,839 | - | Hart InterCivic | 70% | 1 | 26% | 0.8 | 67% | 32% | 2.1 |
OTERO | 8,948 | - | Hart InterCivic | 60% | 1.1 | 35% | 0.7 | 52% | 47% | 1.1 |
OURAY | 2,768 | 95% | Hart InterCivic | 46% | 0.9 | 47% | 1.1 | 54% | 45% | 1.2 |
PARK | 10,544 | - | Dominion Voting Systems | 58% | 0.9 | 35% | 1 | 65% | 33% | 1.9 |
PHILLIPS | 2,639 | - | Hart InterCivic | 75% | 1 | 21% | 0.9 | 76% | 23% | 3.3 |
PITKIN | 10,038 | - | Dominion Voting Systems | 25% | 0.8 | 70% | 1 | 31% | 67% | 0.5 |
PROWERS | 5,207 | - | Hart InterCivic | 66% | 1 | 29% | 0.9 | 67% | 32% | 2.1 |
PUEBLO | 77,532 | - | Dominion Voting Systems | 47% | 1.3 | 46% | 0.8 | 37% | 62% | 0.6 |
RIO BLANCO | 3,714 | - | Hart InterCivic | 81% | 0.9 | 14% | 1.2 | 88% | 12% | 7.6 |
RIO GRANDE | 5,220 | 90% | Hart InterCivic | 59% | 1.1 | 35% | 0.8 | 56% | 43% | 1.3 |
ROUTT | 13,049 | - | Hart InterCivic | 39% | 0.8 | 54% | 1.1 | 47% | 51% | 0.9 |
SAGUACHE | 3,404 | - | Premier/Diebold+ES&S | 36% | 1.1 | 55% | 0.8 | 33% | 66% | 0.5 |
SAN JUAN | 430 | - | Hart InterCivic | 41% | 1 | 55% | 1 | 43% | 53% | 0.8 |
SAN MIGUEL | 4,324 | - | Hart InterCivic | 26% | 1 | 67% | 0.9 | 26% | 71% | 0.4 |
SEDGWICK | 1,567 | - | Dominion Voting Systems | 59% | 0.8 | 35% | 1.6 | 78% | 22% | 3.5 |
SUMMIT | 15,411 | - | Hart InterCivic | 33% | 0.8 | 59% | 1.1 | 42% | 56% | 0.7 |
TELLER | 14,420 | - | Dominion Voting Systems | 66% | 0.9 | 27% | 1.1 | 73% | 25% | 2.9 |
WASHINGTON | 3,029 | - | Dominion Voting Systems | 81% | 0.9 | 14% | 1.2 | 88% | 12% | 7.5 |
WELD | 132,072 | - | Premier/Diebold | 58% | 1 | 35% | 0.9 | 61% | 38% | 1.6 |
YUMA | 5,881 | - | Hart InterCivic | 76% | 1 | 20% | 0.9 | 78% | 22% | 3.6 |
Click legend entry to show or hide a line.
Options:
Note: X/Y graph display only works for all votes, sorted by precinct size (number of votes)
These graphs show each candidate's CUMULATIVE percent of the vote for all points to the left of and including each precinct. As you move to the right, the results from more and more precincts are included. If you choose "ALL" votes, the points at the far right of the graph represent the outcome of the election.
In order to get a sense of what might be expected if there is no strong correlation between precinct size and political leaning, select "Count votes: In random order". Each time you redraw the graph you will see cumulative totals for randomly sorted precincts.
Benford's Law Analysis
This analysis compares the expected statistical distribution of the left-most digit of the vote count of each precinct to what would be expected for randomly distributed vote counts. It is a method used by forensic accountants to detect possible fraud. There is controversy about whether this law can be applied to elections, but we thought we would have a look at it anyway. Read more here.
NOTE: We show this analysis when there are 50 or more precincts in the set. Some argue that this analysis is best used with sets containing approximately 500 data points or more. Additionally, it is likely to fail if there are a great many precincts of approximately the same size.
NOTE: We show this analysis when there are 50 or more precincts in the set. Some argue that this analysis is best used with sets containing approximately 500 data points or more. Additionally, it is likely to fail if there are a great many precincts of approximately the same size.
Expected Benford's Law Distribution
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
Leftmost Digit of Vote Count - Frequency of Occurrence
Benford's Law Distribution for Hillary Clinton
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
Leftmost Digit of Vote Count - Frequency of Occurance
Benford's Law Distribution for Donald J Trump
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
Leftmost Digit of Vote Count - Frequency of Occurance
Benford's Law Distribution for Gary Johnson
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
Leftmost Digit of Vote Count - Frequency of Occurance
Benford's Law Distribution for Jill Stein
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
Leftmost Digit of Vote Count - Frequency of Occurance
Benford's Law Distribution for Darrell L Castle
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
Leftmost Digit of Vote Count - Frequency of Occurance
Show Data
Leftmost Digit | Expected Distribution | Hillary Clinton | Donald J Trump | Gary Johnson | Jill Stein | Darrell L Castle |
1 | 30.1% | 10.9% | 19.6% | 15.6% | 41.8% | 25% |
2 | 17.6% | 12.2% | 17.9% | 13.6% | 19.3% | 15.3% |
3 | 12.5% | 16.4% | 15.1% | 15.2% | 7.6% | 14.5% |
4 | 9.7% | 17.9% | 12.1% | 13.8% | 5.5% | 12.5% |
5 | 7.9% | 15.3% | 10.6% | 12.4% | 4.8% | 10.6% |
6 | 6.7% | 11.8% | 8.4% | 10.2% | 5.9% | 8.1% |
7 | 5.8% | 8.1% | 6.7% | 8.5% | 5.4% | 6.1% |
8 | 5.1% | 4.9% | 5.4% | 6.5% | 4.6% | 4.8% |
9 | 4.6% | 2.5% | 4.1% | 4.2% | 5.2% | 3.2% |