2016, November 8 – President of the United States

Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /home/customer/www/votesleuth.org/public_html/wp-content/themes/hackbuster/functions.php on line 6509

Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /home/customer/www/votesleuth.org/public_html/wp-content/themes/hackbuster/functions.php on line 6905

Colorado

ALL votes from all counties.
Precincts added in order of number of votes.

Voters: 2,732,665 Precincts (polling places): 2,989 Average voters per precinct: 914 Votes in median precinct: 1,131
Voting Machine:

Data from: Colorado Secretary of State
Data file

Statewide aggregated Republican margin percentage increase (deltaM): 1.5%
Statewide aggregated Republican margin vote increase (deltaMxV): 42,023

deltaM by County (for counties with more than 50 polling places)

County	deltaM	deltaMxV	Precincts	Voting Machine
ADAMS	-7.6%	-14,451	242	Dominion Voting Systems
ARAPAHOE	4.4%	13,057	381	Dominion Voting Systems
BOULDER	3.3%	6,084	233	Hart InterCivic
DENVER	3.5%	11,512	346	Dominion Voting Systems
DOUGLAS	-0.2%	-310	155	Hart InterCivic
EL PASO	5.5%	17,190	242	Premier/Diebold
JEFFERSON	0.5%	1,463	257	ES&S
LARIMER	-1.5%	-2,939	172	Premier/Diebold
MESA	-6.1%	-4,554	57	Dominion Voting Systems
PUEBLO	17.4%	13,477	128	Dominion Voting Systems
WELD	1.1%	1,494	130	Premier/Diebold

Voter Stats by County

Click column header to sort.

County	Total Votes	Turnout	Voting Machine	Rep Votes	VFR*	Dem Votes	VFD*	Reg Reps	Reg Dems	Reg Reps/Dems
ADAMS	189,249	-	Dominion Voting Systems	42%	1	51%	0.9	41%	58%	0.7
ALAMOSA	7,115	-	ES&S	41%	1	51%	0.9	42%	56%	0.8
ARAPAHOE	297,524	-	Dominion Voting Systems	39%	0.9	54%	1	45%	53%	0.8
ARCHULETA	6,769	91%	Premier/Diebold	58%	0.9	35%	1.1	66%	33%	2
BACA	3,518	-	Dominion Voting Systems	72%	1.1	23%	0.7	67%	32%	2.1
BENT	1,585	79%	Hart InterCivic	63%	1.2	31%	0.7	52%	47%	1.1
BOULDER	185,770	-	Hart InterCivic	22%	0.8	71%	1	28%	70%	0.4
BROOMFIELD	37,382	-	Dominion Voting Systems	39%	0.8	53%	1.1	48%	50%	1
CHAFFEE	10,789	-	Dominion Voting Systems	49%	0.9	44%	1	56%	42%	1.3
CHEYENNE	1,478	-	Hart InterCivic	72%	0.9	22%	1.4	83%	17%	5.1
CLEAR CREEK	4,942	-	Dominion Voting Systems	45%	0.9	46%	0.9	48%	50%	1
CONEJOS	4,546	95%	Hart InterCivic	48%	1.1	46%	0.8	42%	57%	0.7
COSTILLA	1,768	79%	Hart InterCivic	33%	1.6	62%	0.8	21%	78%	0.3
CROWLEY	1,605	-	Hart InterCivic	66%	1	27%	0.8	67%	32%	2.1
CUSTER	2,139	72%	Hart InterCivic	69%	0.9	25%	1.3	80%	19%	4.2
DELTA	16,907	-	Hart InterCivic	71%	1	24%	0.9	71%	28%	2.5
DENVER	328,454	-	Dominion Voting Systems	19%	0.8	74%	1	23%	75%	0.3
DOLORES	1,421	-	Hart InterCivic	47%	0.7	47%	1.4	65%	34%	1.9
DOUGLAS	183,181	-	Hart InterCivic	56%	0.8	37%	1.2	68%	30%	2.3
EAGLE	25,011	-	Dominion Voting Systems	37%	0.8	56%	1.1	46%	52%	0.9
EL PASO	312,328	-	Premier/Diebold	57%	0.9	35%	1	63%	35%	1.8
ELBERT	16,057	-	Sequoia	73%	0.9	21%	1.1	80%	19%	4.3
FREMONT	21,930	-	Hart InterCivic	70%	1	24%	0.8	68%	30%	2.2
GARFIELD	25,970	-	Hart InterCivic	50%	0.9	43%	1	55%	43%	1.3
GILPIN	3,687	-	Dominion Voting Systems	53%	1.1	39%	0.8	47%	51%	0.9
GRAND	8,373	-	Hart InterCivic	52%	0.8	41%	1.2	63%	35%	1.8
GUNNISON	9,777	-	Dominion Voting Systems	35%	0.8	55%	1	43%	54%	0.8
HINSDALE	285	49%	Hart InterCivic	68%	0.9	22%	1	77%	21%	3.6
HUERFANO	4,206	-	Premier/Diebold	51%	1.4	43%	0.7	38%	61%	0.6
JACKSON	650	67%	Not Applicable+Hart InterCivic	75%	0.9	20%	1.3	84%	15%	5.6
JEFFERSON	320,985	-	ES&S	43%	0.9	50%	1	49%	49%	1
KIOWA	1,865	-	Hart InterCivic	61%	0.8	32%	1.5	78%	21%	3.7
KIT CARSON	3,457	99%	Hart InterCivic	81%	1	15%	0.8	80%	19%	4.2
LA PLATA	30,465	-	Premier/Diebold	41%	0.9	50%	1	47%	51%	0.9
LAKE	3,172	90%	Dominion Voting Systems	40%	1.3	51%	0.8	30%	67%	0.5
LARIMER	192,825	-	Premier/Diebold	43%	0.8	48%	1.1	52%	46%	1.1
LAS ANIMAS	6,173	82%	Hart InterCivic	56%	1.5	39%	0.6	37%	62%	0.6
LINCOLN	2,705	-	Hart InterCivic	72%	0.9	24%	1.2	79%	20%	4
LOGAN	9,675	-	Dominion Voting Systems	76%	1	19%	0.8	74%	25%	3
MESA	74,710	-	Dominion Voting Systems	65%	1	29%	0.9	68%	31%	2.2
MINERAL	525	80%	Premier/Diebold	0%	0	86%	1.9	55%	45%	1.2
MOFFAT	6,732	-	Hart InterCivic	80%	1	15%	0.8	80%	19%	4.2
MONTEZUMA	11,204	83%	Premier/Diebold	64%	1	29%	0.9	65%	34%	1.9
MONTROSE	21,706	-	Hart InterCivic	67%	0.9	28%	1	71%	28%	2.6
MORGAN	11,839	-	Hart InterCivic	70%	1	26%	0.8	67%	32%	2.1
OTERO	8,948	-	Hart InterCivic	60%	1.1	35%	0.7	52%	47%	1.1
OURAY	2,768	95%	Hart InterCivic	46%	0.9	47%	1.1	54%	45%	1.2
PARK	10,544	-	Dominion Voting Systems	58%	0.9	35%	1	65%	33%	1.9
PHILLIPS	2,639	-	Hart InterCivic	75%	1	21%	0.9	76%	23%	3.3
PITKIN	10,038	-	Dominion Voting Systems	25%	0.8	70%	1	31%	67%	0.5
PROWERS	5,207	-	Hart InterCivic	66%	1	29%	0.9	67%	32%	2.1
PUEBLO	77,532	-	Dominion Voting Systems	47%	1.3	46%	0.8	37%	62%	0.6
RIO BLANCO	3,714	-	Hart InterCivic	81%	0.9	14%	1.2	88%	12%	7.6
RIO GRANDE	5,220	90%	Hart InterCivic	59%	1.1	35%	0.8	56%	43%	1.3
ROUTT	13,049	-	Hart InterCivic	39%	0.8	54%	1.1	47%	51%	0.9
SAGUACHE	3,404	-	Premier/Diebold+ES&S	36%	1.1	55%	0.8	33%	66%	0.5
SAN JUAN	430	-	Hart InterCivic	41%	1	55%	1	43%	53%	0.8
SAN MIGUEL	4,324	-	Hart InterCivic	26%	1	67%	0.9	26%	71%	0.4
SEDGWICK	1,567	-	Dominion Voting Systems	59%	0.8	35%	1.6	78%	22%	3.5
SUMMIT	15,411	-	Hart InterCivic	33%	0.8	59%	1.1	42%	56%	0.7
TELLER	14,420	-	Dominion Voting Systems	66%	0.9	27%	1.1	73%	25%	2.9
WASHINGTON	3,029	-	Dominion Voting Systems	81%	0.9	14%	1.2	88%	12%	7.5
WELD	132,072	-	Premier/Diebold	58%	1	35%	0.9	61%	38%	1.6
YUMA	5,881	-	Hart InterCivic	76%	1	20%	0.9	78%	22%	3.6

* VFR and VFD are Republican and Democratic Voting Factors. This is the ratio of percent of Republican votes to the percent of registered Republicans, and the percent of Democratic votes to the percent of registered Democrats

Click legend entry to show or hide a line.

Options:

County:	Vote type: All
Count votes:	Graph type:

Note: X/Y graph display only works for all votes, sorted by precinct size (number of votes)

These graphs show each candidate's CUMULATIVE percent of the vote for all points to the left of and including each precinct. As you move to the right, the results from more and more precincts are included. If you choose "ALL" votes, the points at the far right of the graph represent the outcome of the election.

In order to get a sense of what might be expected if there is no strong correlation between precinct size and political leaning, select "Count votes: In random order". Each time you redraw the graph you will see cumulative totals for randomly sorted precincts.

Benford's Law Analysis

Download graph data

Leftmost Digit	Expected Distribution	Hillary Clinton	Donald J Trump	Gary Johnson	Jill Stein	Darrell L Castle
1	30.1%	10.9%	19.6%	15.6%	41.8%	25%
2	17.6%	12.2%	17.9%	13.6%	19.3%	15.3%
3	12.5%	16.4%	15.1%	15.2%	7.6%	14.5%
4	9.7%	17.9%	12.1%	13.8%	5.5%	12.5%
5	7.9%	15.3%	10.6%	12.4%	4.8%	10.6%
6	6.7%	11.8%	8.4%	10.2%	5.9%	8.1%
7	5.8%	8.1%	6.7%	8.5%	5.4%	6.1%
8	5.1%	4.9%	5.4%	6.5%	4.6%	4.8%
9	4.6%	2.5%	4.1%	4.2%	5.2%	3.2%