Michigan 2016 Election – Overview

Our analysis of the 2016 Presidential Race in Michigan shows that 13 of its 17 largest counties show a “red shift”, meaning the Republican share of the vote increases when votes are totaled from smallest to largest precinct.

As explained on our home page, an election should normally obey the law of large numbers fairly well, unless there is a strong reason for people in larger precincts to vote one way rather than another.

This type of analysis is known as a Cumulative Vote Analysis (CVA) or Cumulative Vote Total (CVT).

For our analysis of Michigan, we started by looking at the state as a whole. This is what we found:


CVA analysis for Michigan 2016 Presidential Election


As you can see, even the state as a whole shows a pattern of increased Republican votes in precincts where more people voted. The point in the middle of the x-axis represents the median-sized precinct (905 votes), and the red and blue lines show how many people in precincts of this size and smaller voted for each candidate. As you can see, for this set of small-to-medium sized precincts approximately 44% of voters chose the Republican candidate. Adding in the results for just slightly larger precincts we can see that if you look at all votes from precincts less than 1063 votes, the Republican candidate now has over 46% of the vote. Looking to the far right of the graph we can see the final outcome for all precincts: just over 50% of the total vote went to the Republican candidate.

In an attempt to understand why this might be, we looked at the state county by county. This pattern is even more clear looking at several of the largest counties in the state:

Here are the interactive graphs for Genessee, Kent, and Wayne (outside of Detroit) Counties.


In two counties we see a “blue shift”, meaning that the largest precincts show increased numbers of votes for the Democratic candidate. Both of the counties displaying a blue shift match the demographic pattern of smaller less urban precincts surrounding a few large urban precincts. One of these counties, Washentaw, is home to Ann Arbor, the other, Jackson, is home to Jackson City. In both cases, all the largest precincts in those counties fall within these large cities with collegiate and/or urban demographics.


Here are the interactive graphs for Washentaw, and Jackson Counties.

A second very odd phenomenon occurred in this election.
There were two Supreme Court Justice races in which the voting pattern was radically different from that for the Presidential race. In these races, all precincts in all counties voted Republican. Even precincts in Detroit City, where on average slightly over 3% of voters chose the Republican presidential candidate, 56% of voters chose the Republican Justice Candidate.
CVA analysis for 2016 Justice Race in Michigan

Here are the graphs for the justice race in the counties we looked at above:

Here are the interactive graphs for Genessee, Kent, and Wayne Counties.


We estimate that a large number of votes may have been shifted from the Democratic to the Republican candidate via these “red shifts”, as we can not immediately see a demographic reason for them.